The seed law had made it possible to track the number of acres of GMO crops in Vermont — a number that has increased dramatically in the past decade, Stander said. Campbell Soup was the first of these large companies to announce, in January, that it would begin labeling nationally.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Others, such as PepsiCo, never made an official announcement, but Orell said people have seen GMO-containing products labeled on store shelves as far away from Vermont as Hawaii. Whether these companies continue to label genetically modified products voluntarily under the new federal law remains to be seen. In Albany, Orell helped to form a statewide coalition that has been pushing for a GMO labeling law since Coalition members actively pushed out alerts to call legislators and come to lobby days.
Orell and Henderson said the New York labeling bill was strongly opposed by lobbyists for the Farm Bureau, the Grocery Manufacturers Association and the biotechnology industry. One of those lobbyists, a former deputy state agriculture commissioner, showed up to take pictures whenever the pro-labeling campaign staged public events, Henderson said.
Welcome Messages - Conference Series
On Beacon Hill, a GMO labeling bill garnered more than 75 percent of state legislators as co-sponsors. Although advocates of GMO labeling are often accused of being anti-science, Dagoberto knows the scientific perspective well: He studied biotechnology and genetics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, graduating in Last summer, the House voted in favor of a bill, ironically titled the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, to prohibit individual states from requiring labeling of genetically modified foods.
This year, labeling opponents focused their efforts first in the U. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell fast-tracked the bill, a maneuver that allowed the leadership to bring it to the floor for a vote without any witnesses giving testimony or amendments being considered. The bill passed the Senate by a vote of Despite an outcry from labeling opponents and a petition to the White House, the president signed it into law on July House members representing Vermont, western Massachusetts and eastern New York all voted against the federal law except Rep.
Making the Nation Safe from Fire:: A Path Forward in Research
Elise Stefanik, who supported it. Advocates said one critical factor that allowed the anti-labeling bill to advance in the Senate was the decision of the Organic Trade Association, a trade group representing organic food producers, to support the so-called compromise legislation. The group cast the bill as the best deal that could be achieved — and even went so far as to criticize organic farm and food groups who opposed the bill, saying they were dividing the organic movement.
Advocates point out that all kinds of other data — nutrition information, a calorie count, ingredient list, and so on — are already printed on labels. Only for information about genetic engineering will consumers have to take extra steps beyond reading the label.
She said some national groups are looking into the possibility of suing on the grounds that the law is discriminatory, and hence unconstitutional, given that more than million Americans do not own a smart phone. Stander said another concern is that the new federal law will limit the range of items subject to classification as genetically engineered. This means high-fructose corn syrup and canola, soy and corn oils, all routinely made from genetically modified crops, would be excluded from the disclosure requirement, explained Liana Hoodes, formerly executive director and now a policy adviser for the National Organic Coalition.
Disclosure also will not be required if the genetic modification could have been achieved through conventional breeding. Such a claim would appear to be difficult, if not impossible, to prove and extremely difficult to police. Hoodes said the National Organic Standards Board has convened panels to look at how to include newer genetic technologies in the definition of genetic engineering that is excluded from certified organic products. But the new federal law goes in the opposite direction.
She cited recent survey research that found a large jump in the number of people who are able to identify the five crops most commonly produced with genetic engineering. When General Mills announced that it would reformulate its classic Cheerios brand, Stander said the group Moms Across America ran a massive social media campaign, and the company decided to remove genetically modified ingredients from the cereal. Though Stander said she is frustrated by the passage of the new federal law, she remains energized by what has already been accomplished.
Department of Agriculture develops rules to implement the new federal law. Focusing on the details of the new law might also help create public pressure to improve the law, Stander suggested.
Climate Change and Migration
On Aug. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. But action on GMO labeling will not be restricted to the political arena. Nearly , people have already signed up to boycott brands that refuse to label products genetically modified ingredients — as well as those organic companies that supported the new law. Henderson, the organic farmer from western New York, said she supports GMO labeling in part because she wants people to be able to avoid food that contains glyphosate, the herbicide better known by the brand name Roundup.
Last year, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen.
The weed killer is used in tandem with the most popular types of genetically modified crops, Roundup Ready corn and soybeans. Its use has skyrocketed since these herbicide-resistant crops first went on the market. The USDA also has significantly increased the allowable levels of glyphosate in food to accommodate the actual residual levels that result from heavy spraying of these crops. The organic movement has played a crucial role in propelling GMO labeling forward. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Average Review. Write a Review. Related Searches. An Assessment of the Prospects for Inertial Fusion. The potential for using fusion energy to produce commercial electric power was first explored in The potential for using fusion energy to produce commercial electric power was first explored in the s. Harnessing fusion energy offers the prospect of a nearly carbon-free energy source with a virtually unlimited supply of fuel.
Unlike nuclear fission plants, View Product. Assessment of Planetary Protection Requirements for Spacecraft. NASA's exploration of planets and satellites during the past 50 years has led to the NASA's exploration of planets and satellites during the past 50 years has led to the discovery of traces of water ice throughout the solar system and prospects for large liquid water reservoirs beneath the frozen ICE shells of multiple satellites Ballistic Imaging.
Ballistic Imaging assesses the state of computer-based imaging technology in forensic firearms identification.
The book The book evaluates the current law enforcement database of images of crime-related cartridge cases and bullets and recommends ways to improve the usefulness of the technology for Big Data:: A Workshop Report. From the list of topics given Biometric Recognition:: Challenges and Opportunities. Biometric recognition--the automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioral and biological characteristic--is promoted as Biometric recognition--the automated recognition of individuals based on their behavioral and biological characteristic--is promoted as a way to help identify terrorists, provide better control of access to physical facilities and financial accounts, and increase the efficiency of access to services Given the dramatic changes in the environment for national defense, concurrent with rapid improvements in Given the dramatic changes in the environment for national defense, concurrent with rapid improvements in commercial manufacturing capabilities, the Department of Defense DOD requires a new approach to designing, engineering, manufacturing, buying, and upgrading weapon systems.